<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>TyePorter.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tyeporter.com/blog/?feed=rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tyeporter.com/blog</link>
	<description>"The Truth Is Hate To Those Who Hate The Truth"</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 17:48:50 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Burn Baby Burn!</title>
		<link>http://tyeporter.com/blog/?p=995</link>
		<comments>http://tyeporter.com/blog/?p=995#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 17:47:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Porter</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Are You Kidding?]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Christianity]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Politically Inclined]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tyeporter.com/blog/?p=995</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So this little church in Florida is going to burn copies of the Q&#8217;ran on 9/11.
Of course every moslum in the world is protesting, including Obama.
In Kabul, protesters burned effigies of the Pastor of the Florida church.
In the past, they would have been burning likenesses of Bush but since the current occupant of The White [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So this little church in Florida is going to burn copies of the Q&#8217;ran on 9/11.</p>
<p>Of course every moslum in the world is protesting, including Obama.<br />
In Kabul, protesters burned effigies of the Pastor of the Florida church.<br />
In the past, they would have been burning likenesses of Bush but since the current occupant of The White House is a moslum, the protesters have to go for their second choice.</p>
<p>And the moslums were burnign the American flag and making death threats to Americans and the Pastor.<br />
Even the liberal left has condemned the bonfire.<br />
All these wicked people are condemning the burning of the Q&#8217;ran while they are burning the flag, images of the Pastor and were involved in the burning of effigies of Bush just a few years ago.</p>
<p>
Hypocrites!</p>
<p>You can see the news clip &#8212;> <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/video/2010/09/07/VI2010090701851.html" target="_blank">here</a> <&#8212;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tyeporter.com/blog/?feed=rss2&amp;p=995</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Scripture - Is It Hatred &#038; Vulgarity?</title>
		<link>http://tyeporter.com/blog/?p=992</link>
		<comments>http://tyeporter.com/blog/?p=992#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 18:51:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Porter</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Are You Kidding?]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Christianity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tyeporter.com/blog/?p=992</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There are Christians who&#8217;ve told me that when I rattle off Scripture that isn&#8217;t all fluffy, lovey dovey and whatnot, I&#8217;m being vulgar and negative.
Huh?
James 4:4

&#8220;You adulterous people, don&#8217;t you know that friendship with the world is hatred toward God?
Anyone who chooses to be a friend of the world becomes an enemy of God.&#8221;


So that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are Christians who&#8217;ve told me that when I rattle off Scripture that isn&#8217;t all fluffy, lovey dovey and whatnot, I&#8217;m being vulgar and negative.</p>
<p>Huh?</p>
<p>James 4:4</p>
<blockquote><p><em><br />
&#8220;You adulterous people, don&#8217;t you know that friendship with the world is hatred toward God?<br />
Anyone who chooses to be a friend of the world becomes an enemy of God.&#8221;<br />
</em></p></blockquote>
<p>
So that must be hatred, right?<br />
Or is it simply truth and some just can&#8217;t &#8230;<br />
Nope, I just KNOW you heard the rest of that quote in your head, no reason for me to go there!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tyeporter.com/blog/?feed=rss2&amp;p=992</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Healthcare - Election Year Issue - For Democrats Too!</title>
		<link>http://tyeporter.com/blog/?p=990</link>
		<comments>http://tyeporter.com/blog/?p=990#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 12:25:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Porter</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Are You Kidding?]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Politically Inclined]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tyeporter.com/blog/?p=990</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Only 34 liberals voted against obamacare and of those 34, 5 are using their &#8220;no&#8221; vote in their re-election campaigns.
According to columnist Jennifer Haberkorn in her article:


Most of the Democrats running ads highlighting their opposition to the law are in conservative-leaning districts and considered the most endangered. They’re using their vote against the overhaul as [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Only 34 liberals voted against obamacare and of those 34, 5 are using their &#8220;no&#8221; vote in their re-election campaigns.<br />
According to columnist <a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0910/41777.html" target="_blank">Jennifer Haberkorn in her article</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>
<em><br />
Most of the Democrats running ads highlighting their opposition to the law are in conservative-leaning districts and considered the most endangered. They’re using their vote against the overhaul as proof of their willingness to buck party leadership and their commitment to watching the nation’s debt<br />
</em>
</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tyeporter.com/blog/?feed=rss2&amp;p=990</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Professional&#8221; Child Pornography - The New Business Model</title>
		<link>http://tyeporter.com/blog/?p=986</link>
		<comments>http://tyeporter.com/blog/?p=986#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 05:14:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Porter</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Are You Kidding?]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Say What?]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tyeporter.com/blog/?p=986</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve been told I tend to run down that rabbit hole.
And for good reasons - they are correct.
In the past I used to be so concerned how my money was spent that not only did I dig into those businesses I chose to patronize but I&#8217;d dig into from whom those companies brought their stocks [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been told I tend to run down that rabbit hole.<br />
And for good reasons - they are correct.</p>
<p>In the past I used to be so concerned how my money was spent that not only did I dig into those businesses I chose to patronize but I&#8217;d dig into from whom those companies brought their stocks and how they spent their money.</p>
<p>For example, let&#8217;s say Walmart supported homosexual marriage.<br />
Red Flag.<br />
I would have found that they not only give money to homosexual organizations but then I&#8217;d find that they&#8217;d hire lawyers who defended other pro-homo companies.<br />
And I&#8217;d find that suppliers A, B &#038; C of &#8220;X&#8221; product to Walmart, also support homosexual causes AND abortion.<br />
Not satified, I&#8217;d start checking out the suppliers of the suppliers.<br />
And I&#8217;d look up and realize the sun was rising and it was time to go back to work already.</p>
<p>
So I stopped obssessing and just let it go.</p>
<p>But today I was down in Englewood and passed the TCB bank on Evans &#038; Broadway.<br />
The bank was using teenaged girls, in little black bikinis to sell the business.<br />
Then I remembered mid summer this year that a Ruby Tuesday on Illif &#038; Blackhawk in Aurora had a bunch of bikini clad teenaged girls running around in traffic with hand held signs directing folks into the establishment.</p>
<p>Both times - earlier and today - I was embarrassed to look left or right.<br />
A grown man couldn&#8217;t look around at an intersection because women - well, they had the figures of women but they were teens at most - were bouncing around in strings, flip flop and sunglasses.</p>
<p>
So other than the fact that there must be some middle aged old pervert managing the joints, what does all this tell us about these businesses?</p>
<p>That we can forget the hand baskets - our country&#8217;s free falling with no chute into hell?<br />
That for whatever other reason, girls are wearing their skirts and shorts soo short lately that even they are uncomfortable walking around.<br />
I see them holding their skirts and shorts down over their cheeks as they walk, because they are embarrassed at the fact that we can see their smiles as they walk.<br />
And another fashion is the painted on skin tight &#8220;tights&#8221;.<br />
Not just tight jeans, but the actual tights, like hose.<br />
So tight that they look painted on - and nothing over them.<br />
Gals are wearing these as &#8220;pants&#8221; - leaving absolutely NOTHING to the imagination.<br />
Their shirts or no looser nor are they any less revealing.<br />
And they are not long enough to cover the tights below the waist.</p>
<p>
Barely there clothing and bare teens promoting ocal businesses in tiny town USA.<br />
That&#8217;s what the culture of our Nation is coming to.</p>
<p>And that&#8217;s embarrassing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tyeporter.com/blog/?feed=rss2&amp;p=986</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>This isn&#8217;t an &#8220;electoral wave,&#8221; it&#8217;s a temper tantrum.</title>
		<link>http://tyeporter.com/blog/?p=984</link>
		<comments>http://tyeporter.com/blog/?p=984#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 16:28:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Porter</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Politically Inclined]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Liberal Moaning And Groaning Spoiled Brats]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tyeporter.com/blog/?p=984</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Washington Post - not the most conservative or accurate rag on the block but at least it&#8217;s a well known paper.
Whether that should be infamous or famous I&#8217;ll leave to you.
Today we have an article written by Eugene Robinson.
I don&#8217;t think he has a conservative cell in his body.
No doubt in my mind that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Washington Post - not the most conservative or accurate rag on the block but at least it&#8217;s a well known paper.<br />
Whether that should be infamous or famous I&#8217;ll leave to you.</p>
<p>Today we have <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/09/02/AR2010090203992.html" target="_blank">an article written by Eugene Robinson</a>.<br />
I don&#8217;t think he has a conservative cell in his body.<br />
No doubt in my mind that if we dug deeper into his hatred of Americans, of Conservatives - it would come down to race.<br />
Either he&#8217;d be a racist or he&#8217;d say everybody opposed to his viewpoints was a racist.<br />
We can thank obama (Barry Soetoro) for indoctrinating half our black Americans into thinking that way about the rest of the nation, regardless of their personal skin colour.</p>
<p>So his article&#8230;<br />
He believes that the reason Americans are kicking the liberals out on their butts this November has nothing to do with the forced issuance of obamacare/socialized medicine, with the record national debt, with the record 19% unemployment, with the nationalization of banks &#038; car companies, with the bungled mis handling of the fiasco in the Gulf, with the record vacation days &#038; costs, with the racism, with the hatred, etc etc etc<br />
He believes that Americans are simply throwing a temper tantrum.<br />
He admits that Americans are overwhelmingly fed up with the liberals, with the liberal politics and economy but said that while it&#8217;s bad form to question American&#8217;s wisdom, the public mood makes no sense to him!<br />
He said we&#8217;re just a bunch of spoiled brats&#8230;.<br />
Well now, Mr. Robinson&#8230;</p>
<p>God Bless You Too!</p>
<blockquote><p>
<em><br />
According to polls, Americans are in a mood to hold their breath until they turn blue. Voters appear to be so fed up with the Democrats that they&#8217;re ready to toss them out in favor of the Republicans &#8212; for whom, according to those same polls, the nation has even greater contempt. This isn&#8217;t an &#8220;electoral wave,&#8221; it&#8217;s a temper tantrum. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s bad enough that the Democratic Party&#8217;s &#8220;favorable&#8221; rating has fallen to an abysmal 33 percent, according to a recent NBC-Wall Street Journal poll. It&#8217;s worse that the Republican Party&#8217;s favorability has plunged to just 24 percent. But incredibly, according to Gallup, registered voters say they intend to vote for Republicans over Democrats by an astounding 10-point margin. Respected analysts reckon that the GOP has a chance of gaining 45 to 60 seats in the House, which would bring Minority Leader John Boehner into the speaker&#8217;s office. </p>
<p>My guess is that with a decided advantage in campaign funds, along with the other advantages of incumbency, Democrats will be able to mitigate these prospective losses &#8212; perhaps even relieving Nancy Pelosi of the hassles of moving. But there&#8217;s no mistaking the public mood, and the truth is that it makes no sense. </p>
<p>In the punditry business, it&#8217;s considered bad form to question the essential wisdom of the American people. But at this point, it&#8217;s impossible to ignore the obvious: The American people are acting like a bunch of spoiled brats. </p>
<p>This is not, I repeat not, a partisan argument. My own political leanings are well-known, but the refusal of Americans to look seriously at the nation&#8217;s situation &#8212; and its prospects &#8212; is an equal-opportunity scourge. Republicans got the back of the electorate&#8217;s hand in 2006 and 2008; Democrats will feel the sting this November. By 2012, it will probably be the GOP&#8217;s turn to get slapped around again. </p>
<p>The nation demands the impossible: quick, painless solutions to long-term, structural problems. While they&#8217;re running for office, politicians of both parties encourage this kind of magical thinking. When they get into office, they&#8217;re forced to try to explain that things aren&#8217;t quite so simple &#8212; that restructuring our economy, renewing the nation&#8217;s increasingly rickety infrastructure, reforming an unsustainable system of entitlements, redefining America&#8217;s position in the world and all the other massive challenges that face the country are going to require years of effort. But the American people don&#8217;t want to hear any of this. They want somebody to make it all better. Now. </p>
<p>President Obama can point to any number of occasions on which he has told Americans that getting our nation back on track is a long-range project. But his campaign stump speech ended with the exhortation, &#8220;Let&#8217;s go change the world&#8221; &#8212; not, &#8220;Let&#8217;s go change the world slowly and incrementally, waiting years before we see the fruits of our labor.&#8221; </p>
<p>And one thing he really hasn&#8217;t done is frame the hard work that lies ahead as a national crusade that will require a degree of sacrifice from every one of us. It&#8217;s obvious, for example, that the solution to our economic woes is not just to reinflate the housing bubble. New foundations have to be laid for a 21st-century economy, starting with weaning the nation off of its dependence on fossil fuels, which means there will have to be an increase in the price of oil. I don&#8217;t want to pay more to fill my gas tank, but I know that it would be good for the nation if I did. </p>
<p>The richest Americans need to pay higher taxes &#8212; not because they&#8217;re bad people who deserve to be punished but because they earn a much bigger share of the nation&#8217;s income and hold a bigger share of its overall wealth. If they don&#8217;t pay more, there won&#8217;t be enough revenue to maintain, much less improve, the kind of infrastructure that fosters economic growth. Think of what the interstate highway system has meant to this country. Now imagine trying to build it today.<br />
<br />
Fixing Social Security for future generations, working steadily to improve the schools, charting a reasonable path on immigration &#8212; none of this is what the American people want to hear. They&#8217;re in the market for quick and easy solutions that won&#8217;t hurt a bit. It&#8217;s easy to blame politicians for selling a bunch of snake oil. But the truth is that all they&#8217;re doing is offering what the public wants to buy. <br />
</em>
</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tyeporter.com/blog/?feed=rss2&amp;p=984</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>To Be Or Not To Be, An &#8220;R&#8221; Or A &#8220;D&#8221;!</title>
		<link>http://tyeporter.com/blog/?p=981</link>
		<comments>http://tyeporter.com/blog/?p=981#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 03:26:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Porter</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Christianity]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Politically Inclined]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Christians are not liberal - cannot be]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tyeporter.com/blog/?p=981</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Evrerybody&#8217;s soo concerned with whether their candidates are Republicans, Democrats, Constitutionalists or even Americans.
They&#8217;re worried whether their candidate will support this issue or that issue.

I think we should be more concerned with the number one qualification:
&#8220;Are They Christians?&#8221;
I know that the Law states we can&#8217;t set that as an official qualification for an elected office.
But [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Evrerybody&#8217;s soo concerned with whether their candidates are Republicans, Democrats, Constitutionalists or even Americans.</p>
<p>They&#8217;re worried whether their candidate will support this issue or that issue.</p>
<p>
I think we should be more concerned with the number one qualification:<br />
&#8220;Are They Christians?&#8221;</p>
<p>I know that the Law states we can&#8217;t set that as an official qualification for an elected office.<br />
But we can use it as an unofficial but still official bar.<br />
And if they meet that ONE standard, if they love God/Jesus Christ.<br />
If they are God fearing, Bible believing Jesus loving Christians then we won&#8217;t have to worry about a single issue, decision or appointment.<br />
If we elect Christians we can know everything about how they&#8217;ll behave, vote and represent in Office.</p>
<p>A Christian Candidate/Representative won&#8217;t support homosexuality anything, won&#8217;t give them special rights, won&#8217;t support healthcare, obama, won&#8217;t be a liberal, democrat or socialist, won&#8217;t support abortion or public schools, won&#8217;t support welfare, social security or any other entitlement programs.<br />
A Christian won&#8217;t turn their backs on Israel and force the Palestinians on them. Won&#8217;t support illegal immigration, outsourcing, the IRS, and a Christian won&#8217;t be a religionist.<br />
Etc etc etc.</p>
<p>So I think we need to first be concerned about the one and most important qualification and all the rest will fall into place.<br />
All of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tyeporter.com/blog/?feed=rss2&amp;p=981</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama Speech On The War &#038; Economy</title>
		<link>http://tyeporter.com/blog/?p=977</link>
		<comments>http://tyeporter.com/blog/?p=977#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 09:48:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Porter</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Are You Kidding?]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Politically Inclined]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[barack hussein obama barry soetoro the war in iraq economy speech]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tyeporter.com/blog/?p=977</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ugh!
Has the guy gotten AYNTHING right yet?
He&#8217;s occupied The White House for close to two years now and he&#8217;s still screwing around.
Unless you look at this from his point of view and then you&#8217;ll notice that he&#8217;s right on track - killing this nation.
So Barry made the promise that on August 31st, 2010 he was [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ugh!</p>
<p>Has the guy gotten AYNTHING right yet?<br />
He&#8217;s occupied The White House for close to two years now and he&#8217;s still screwing around.</p>
<p>Unless you look at this from his point of view and then you&#8217;ll notice that he&#8217;s right on track - killing this nation.</p>
<p>So Barry made the promise that on August 31st, 2010 he was going to call it quits in Iraq.<br />
He announced this fact and deadline to all of his moslum, terrorist brothers in The Middle East.<br />
Last night he kept his promise.</p>
<p>Then he tried tying the economy to the war.<br />
Tried to make it sound that the war ending would help re-employ millions here in the States.<br />
He tried to make us believe that the billions of dollars going overseas would offset the trillions he&#8217;s spending on entitlement programs and nationalizing the private sector.<br />
Or that the tens of thousands of Americans coming home wouldn&#8217;t be needing jobs again in the private sector that he&#8217;s nationalized!</p>
<p>
Barry just keeps hacking away at this great nation and ending this war not only left Iraq hanging but left America hanging as well.<br />
You just know he&#8217;s looking at the money that was earmarked for Iraq with drool on his lips.<br />
He&#8217;s gonna spend that too, probably on more vacations and Secret Service protection!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tyeporter.com/blog/?feed=rss2&amp;p=977</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The End Must Be Near&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://tyeporter.com/blog/?p=974</link>
		<comments>http://tyeporter.com/blog/?p=974#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 17:17:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Porter</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Christianity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tyeporter.com/blog/?p=974</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You know, the Bible talks about the End Times and how only a few are going to truly KNOW God&#8217;s voice when we hear it.
The imposter will pose as God but those of us who KNOW, will know this as the apostate church.
But the imposter is going to fool a crap load of people.
Many who [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, the Bible talks about the End Times and how only a few are going to truly KNOW God&#8217;s voice when we hear it.<br />
The imposter will pose as God but those of us who KNOW, will know this as the apostate church.<br />
But the imposter is going to fool a crap load of people.<br />
Many who call themselves Christians are going to be fooled because they just can&#8217;t tell the difference.</p>
<p>Matthew 7:21 talks about this as folks who thought they knew Him and did great works in who they thought was HIS name, but God says - opps, sorry - I don&#8217;t know you.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s sad and a bit frightening when y&#8217;all think about it.</p>
<p>I got friends who are Christians - or who I believe or thought were Christians who are compromising their faith for the flesh.</p>
<p>Lemme start over.</p>
<p>Ok, we&#8217;re all flesh and we all fall to sin in our lives but we KNOW it&#8217;s sin and we repent, we turn from it and we make no provision for what the flesh wants.<br />
Now Paul says that we all do that which we don&#8217;t want to do and that we don&#8217;t do what we want to do, etc.<br />
Meaning that even though we know something&#8217;s wrong, we&#8217;re going to fall short and do it now and again.<br />
Does that mean we should go out and do it, that&#8217;s it&#8217;s ok because we&#8217;re forgiven?</p>
<p>Like the catholic religion, we can sin all week long because we know we can go into confession and get it all out, do a few hail Marys and Our Fathers and be forgiven anew.<br />
Ano!</p>
<p>What that means is that we obviously need Jesus but having said that, we don&#8217;t go looking to sin.<br />
And we don&#8217;t go around professing to be a representative of Jesus and supporting actions that don&#8217;t represent Him.</p>
<p>A man says he thinks abortion is wrong but it&#8217;s ok in some cases, whatever those cases may be.<br />
Another man says he believes marriage should be between one man and one woman, as God set it up, but that he thinks civil unions are ok and a good compromise.<br />
Or another who says that&#8230;.<br />
Well, I think you got the point.</p>
<p>These folks don&#8217;t represent the Christian Faith, they don&#8217;t represent God and His Word.<br />
Pastors go out and preach The Word and preach it according to the Bible, spot on.<br />
Then they get to the whole forgivness thing.<br />
You know, that sticky little part where God gave us eternal life?<br />
They believe God&#8217;s work on the Cross wasn&#8217;t enough, that man has to improve on it by doing more or less to earn or lose his salvation.<br />
So what we&#8217;re hearing is 99% of the truth then a tiny 1% false Gospel.<br />
That&#8217;s the apostate, that&#8217;s what got folks turned away in Matthew 7:21.</p>
<p>And that&#8217;s what&#8217;s turning friends away from God at the moment.<br />
They are following some imposter&#8217;s voice, not knowing the true sound of God&#8217;s voice and are fooled into thinking that it&#8217;s ok to compromise, to be an apostate and deny the One True Living God.</p>
<p>And the saddest part of this is that telling them does no good.<br />
Showing them The Word is no good.<br />
They only twist the Word to justify their own beliefs or dismiss it outright.</p>
<p>I have to let the Shepherd go after His own flock and just be a good sheep and stay here and graze!<br />
Otherwise&#8230;</p>
<p>Ya know, I say it over and over - it&#8217;s been my slogan on my page for close to a decade now.<br />
&#8220;The Truth Is Hate To Those Who Hate The Truth.&#8221;</p>
<p>And folks hear the truth and hate it, so me parroting that truth is hateful.<br />
I&#8217;m not driving Real Christians away from God, I&#8217;m separating Christians from religionists who hate God.<br />
I&#8217;m expelling from us those who called themselves Christians but who have been judged not to be part of the Body and God tells us to expel these wicked from amoung us.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t let the door hit you on the way out - but don&#8217;t think that doesn&#8217;t mean I don&#8217;t still love you.<br />
I&#8217;m still praying and hoping that the Shepherd drags you back here kicking and screaming if need be, to graze with the rest of us.</p>
<p>I think I just mixed two different groups there - those who are religionists who hate God and don&#8217;t want to be part of true Christianity and those who are part but have strayed - temped by the voice of the other&#8230;<br />
But I think y&#8217;all got what I meant&#8230;.</p>
<p>Yeah, anyway.<br />
I&#8217;m over it.</p>
<p>
I want to pray but I think I&#8217;ll go to my prayer closet for this one.<br />
Cheers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tyeporter.com/blog/?feed=rss2&amp;p=974</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Share The Road With A Bicyclist?</title>
		<link>http://tyeporter.com/blog/?p=972</link>
		<comments>http://tyeporter.com/blog/?p=972#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 04:04:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Porter</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Are You Kidding?]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Say What?]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Share The Road Colorado Bicycle]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tyeporter.com/blog/?p=972</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Colorado has this &#8220;Share The Road&#8221; law.
We&#8217;re supposed to give bicyclists at least 3 feet of clearance and stay behind or in front of them.
Treating them like fellow motorists.
Huh?
They slow traffic.
They obstruct traffic.
They endanger traffic.
And they have no right to be there.
They don&#8217;t pay any taxes or fees that contribute to the raods like vehicles [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Colorado has this &#8220;Share The Road&#8221; law.<br />
We&#8217;re supposed to give bicyclists at least 3 feet of clearance and stay behind or in front of them.<br />
Treating them like fellow motorists.</p>
<p>Huh?</p>
<p>They slow traffic.<br />
They obstruct traffic.<br />
They endanger traffic.</p>
<p>And they have no right to be there.</p>
<p>They don&#8217;t pay any taxes or fees that contribute to the raods like vehicles and motorists do.<br />
So what gives them the right?<br />
Get on the sidewalk and mow down the peds like vehicles will mow you down when you get on the roads.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not advocating any ill will or violence, I&#8217;m just saying that allowing bicycles on the road, whether there is a bike lane is very unsafe.<br />
For both the drivers and the cyclists.</p>
<p>I know it&#8217;s a &#8220;law&#8221; but stay off the road - for all our sakes and safety.</p>
<p>Just saying&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tyeporter.com/blog/?feed=rss2&amp;p=972</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ken Buck - Liberal Who Supports Abortion</title>
		<link>http://tyeporter.com/blog/?p=967</link>
		<comments>http://tyeporter.com/blog/?p=967#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 16:33:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Porter</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Christianity]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Politically Inclined]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tyeporter.com/blog/?p=967</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For some reason Conservatives are jumping on the Ken Buck bandwagon.
I can kinda see why since he agrees with nearly everything I believe.
That said, he falls short on a very important issue and causes a great divide in my vote.
I vote for Christian Candidates, Representatives who represent me, a Christian.
I have Christian values and morals [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For some reason Conservatives are jumping on the Ken Buck bandwagon.<br />
I can kinda see why since he agrees with nearly everything I believe.</p>
<p>That said, he falls short on a very important issue and causes a great divide in my vote.</p>
<p>I vote for Christian Candidates, Representatives who represent me, a Christian.<br />
I have Christian values and morals and want my representatives to have those same values and morals.<br />
That way, once in Office, I can trust that they will continue to represent me.</p>
<p>Ken Buck is not one of these men.</p>
<p>Nearly everything he says sounds like he&#8217;s a conservative until he gets to his Faith.<br />
Christians agree with God and value the lives of both the mother and the unborn baby.<br />
Ken Buck does not.</p>
<p>He supports abortion some of the time.<br />
He does not believe that abortion is absolutely wrong, all of the time - in other words, he does not agree with God.<br />
He disagrees with Christians, The Word of God and God.</p>
<p>If you ask his supporters, they&#8217;ll give you a run around that will boggle your mind.<br />
They&#8217;ll throw words out and in such a quantity that you&#8217;ll go numb.<br />
But that&#8217;s the plan, they obfuscate the truth until you no longer care to search through all their crap to find it.</p>
<p>Bottom line is right on <a href="http://buckforcolorado.com/respect-life" target="_blank">Ken Buck&#8217;s site</a>:<br />
http://buckforcolorado.com/respect-life </p>
<p>In case he&#8217;s taken that down or reworded it - I&#8217;ve got screen shots so let me know!<br />
But it reads:</p>
<blockquote><p>
<em>&#8220;&#8230;Ken believes in the value of life and is opposed to abortion except &#8230;&#8221;</em>
</p></blockquote>
<p>
Right there, he believes abortion is ok some of the time.<br />
It doesn&#8217;t matter whether he &#8220;mis-worded&#8221; it or whether the justifications he&#8217;s giving us for killing babies sounds heart wrenching.<br />
The point is, he believes that under the right conditions, it&#8217;s ok to kill our children.</p>
<p>If a mother&#8217;s life is at risk, you go into surgery with the intent and purpose to save the lives of both the mother AND the baby.<br />
Not - &#8220;let&#8217;s kill the baby to save the mother.&#8221;<br />
That&#8217;s perverse and hateful.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s what Ken Buck supports.<br />
According to his own words, his own website.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t trust me, read his site.<br />
Don&#8217;t trust the confusing and heart breaking stories and explainations his supporters will give you.<br />
Read his site, get his own words.</p>
<p>Everybody tells you that Ken Buck supports life, that he supports <a href="http://www.personhoodcolorado.com/" target="_blank">Ammendment 62 - The Personhood Ammendment</a>.<br />
That&#8217;s all dandy but Ken Buck said he supports abortion some of the time.<br />
That&#8217;s contradictory of what everybody else is telling us.</p>
<p>And that contradicts God, the Christian Faith and Conservative Values.</p>
<p>Ken Buck may have gotten it 99% right and come close but that 1% - my Christian Values - he&#8217;s way off the mark.<br />
Ken Buck doesn&#8217;t reppresent me, a Christian Conservative, child loving American who supports the right to life.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tyeporter.com/blog/?feed=rss2&amp;p=967</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
