Good Ol Barack Hussein Obama, Barry Soetoro.

Good Ol Barack Hussein Obama, Barry Soetoro, and his happy little Socialist Porkulus Bills that y’all call stimulus packages.
Bailing out businesses that in a free market economy should be failing becuase of their poor business practices and criminal behaviour.
But leave it to the socialists to want to give out your money and mine, our hard earned honest money.
They like to give everybody everything but there are strings attached.
They want to tell you what to do with the money they’ve given you.

These failing businesses beg for handouts, for us to reward their bad business behaviour with more money, supporting their further corruption.
The socialists give it to them, of course.
Then these businesses continue in their poor practices and reward their executives with million dollar bonuses for driving the company into the ground.
Now everybody is whining and complaining about these bonuses and about the salaries these execs make.
All paid for with our money.

Don’t get me wrong, I actually agree that they should be in cut back mode and not paying these exhorbant salaries, but trying to barely get by with our money and surviving the depression Barack Hussein Obama, Barry Soetoro, is driving us into.

That said, we should not have given them the money in the first place.
But we did and we now have no say in what they do with it.

The free market, the public has contracts and legal obligations.
These execs are guaranteed those bonuses and salaries because of iron clad contracts.
In fact, one of the socialist leaders under Barack Hussein Obama, Barry Soetoro, actually negotiated holes in the socialist porkulus Bills in order to ensure that these people got their money and we had no say.

Now I actually agree that any money given should have strings attached.
If we give money to another country, we need to know it’s not going to support murdering unborn babies, immoral behavior and perverse activites.
If we’re going to support public education, we need to discontinue the liberal religious indoctrination going on in these camps.
If we’re going to give States and Governments our money, we need to know they don’t give them to homosexuals in the form of benefits, to murder mills killing babies, and so on.
So I really do believe in conditional handouts.
BUT…
You make these conditions absolutely clear and binding before the transaction takes place.

When Barack Hussein Obama, Barry Soetoro, and his socialist pack force universal healthcare on us, they need to make it very clear that we are going to be paying through the nose for it and that they are going to dictate our lifestyles.
Homosexuals will be outlawed because their lifestyle choices shorten their lifespans.
Their behaviours shorten their lives to half that of normal Americans.
Fast food causes all sorts of health issues.
Outdoor sports, smoking, drinking, unprotected sex, everything that is a health risk, will be prohibited.

This is a free nation, we’ll be allowed to do it, but we will be denied benefits and our premiums will increase.
We will be penalized and denied services, denied refunds of our tax dollars.
Refund?
Yeah, if you give money to a service but are denied that service, you get a refund.
If you pay a plumber for a job and he refuses to do it, you get your money back.
If I give my money to the public school system or universal health care but am denied those services, I should get my money back so that I may acquire services from somebody else!

Of course, these socialists want to keep our money, more for them.
No refunds - no shirt no shoes no socialism no service!

Bottom line, these socialists wanted to give away as much of our money as possible and they have so far.
They gave billions of our tax dollars to these private companies who should have gone out of business.
They made certain that these businesses were able to keep every penny.

By rights, these companies and executives should be allowed to keep what they were given, and they are legally allowed to.

When the socialists are involved, it becomes convoluted and murky.
Shady is a better word!

Bailout bonuses?
Tough tookie, folks, we allowed the socialist in Office to give our money away and that he did.
It’s theirs now, we’ll never get it back.

In Colorado, we have a Bill on the floor of the Leg. which will give domestic partnerships for homosexuals.

We already passed laws which established marriage as God defined it.
We’ve already voted down attemps to establish homosexual marriage, partnerships, benefits and every other attempt these special interest groups have asserted on the citizens of this State.
We even passed Ammend 2 back in the 90’s but the minority (homosexuals) somehow got it repealed.

This state has voiced its thoughts on this subject many times.
Since the representatives are socialist, liberals and homosexual this time around, they are trying to push their religious choices and beliefs on the rest of the State.

These same “representatives” are forcing not only their beleifes and religions on the State but are forcing us to pay for the practice thereof!
When I ask for my tax dollars to pay for the education of my choice for our kids - I get my rear end handed to me with the exclamation that they don’t believe tax dollars/their money should support my beliefs.
Turn that around and have them asking us to support the murder of unborn children and support two homosexuals living together and their health care requirements.
I say that my tax dollars - our tax dollars - should not support their beliefs.

SB 88 will take our tax dollars and will provide healthcare benefits to homosexual/domestic partners.
We’ve already passed laws striking down homosexual/domestic partnership.

If we allow this to pass and become law we not only use our tax dollars to support this perverse lifestyle choice but we set a precedent upon which these deviant special interest groups will come back and use as a foundation for repealing our laws and making homosexual partnership and marriage legal.

Prayers for our leaders and for our brothers and sisters who are both fighting against this abomination and living in it, in denial of God.

There is no ban on embryonic stem cell research, it simply doesn’t work.
Over the last decade embryonic stem cell reseach hasn’t panned out a single result, a single cure.
But in that same time adult stem cell research has produced over 70 cures!

Barack Hussein Obama, Barry Soetoro, just lifted President Bush’s Act that banned public funding of genocide - embryonic stem cell research.
Not a ban on the research but a ban on the public support of it using our tax dollars.
Barack Hussein Obama used an Executive Order to repeal that ban because he supports murder, he supports American Genocide and wants you and I to support it with him using our tax dollars!

“Change you can believe in”, thanks Barry!

Overheard on World Net Daily:

A U.S. senator has suggested that voters have made Barack Obama eligible to occupy the Oval Office, whether or not he meets the constitutional mandate of being a “natural born” citizen.

The comments from Sen. Mel Martinez, R-Fla., came in an e-mail sent to a constituent shortly after the election, which just now was forwarded to WND.

The constituent had asked about Martinez’s perspective on the issue on which WND and others have reported: claims made by dozens of lawsuits around the country that Obama might not meet the constitutional qualification for various reasons.

“Presidential candidates are vetted by voters at least twice – first in the primary elections and again in the general election. President-Elect Obama won the Democratic Party’s nomination after one of the most fiercely contested presidential primaries in American history,” Martinez responded.

“And, he has now been duly elected by the majority of voters in the United States. Throughout both the primary and general election, concerns about Mr. Obama’s birthplace were raised. The voters have made clear their view that Mr. Obama meets the qualifications to hold the office of president,” he wrote.

Multiple WND calls to Martinez’s offices in Washington and Florida today asking for comment did not generate a response from the senator.

But he admitted the “federal government has the responsibility to make certain that the Constitution of the United States is not compromised. We must fight to uphold our Constitution through our courts and political processes.”

He cited the constitutional provision requiring a president be “natural born.”

But Martinez noted the Constitution does not provide for an enforcement mechanism, and he cited a federal court opinion that a taxpayer and voter in Pennsylvania didn’t have standing to force Obama to provide documentation of his eligibility.

“The District Court dismissed Mr. [Philip] Berg’s suit and held that the question of Obama’s citizenship is not a matter for a court to decide. The court further noted that voters, not courts, should decide whether a particular presidential candidate is qualified to hold office,” he wrote.

Martinez did not respond to the issue of the actual requirements in the Constitution for the president to be “natural born.”

The WND reader who forwarded the e-mail was alarmed.

—> The Story Continues < ---